Quantcast
Channel: Intel® Software - Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library & Intel® Math Kernel Library
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3005

Major regression between 11.3 Update 2 and Update 3

$
0
0

Hello,

I'm using the QR factorization routines (?geqrf and ??mqr) extensively and it seems there is a major problem when using these routines when a workspace query is assumed (lwork = -1).

Attached is an example to reproduce the issue (with just dgeqrf, but it also appears with dormqr for instance).

$ module load mkl/16.0.2.181 && MKL_VERBOSE=1 ./a.out
MKL_VERBOSE Intel(R) MKL 11.3 Update 2 Product build 20160120 for Intel(R) 64 architecture Intel(R) Streaming SIMD Extensions 4.2 (Intel(R) SSE4.2) enabled processors, Lnx 2.27GHz lp64 intel_thread NMICDev:0
MKL_VERBOSE DGEQRF(10,10,(nil),10,(nil),0x7ffd95e6d300,-1,0) 28.64ms CNR:OFF Dyn:1 FastMM:1 TID:0  NThr:1 WDiv:HOST:+0.000

$ module load mkl/16.0.3.210 && MKL_VERBOSE=1 ./a.out

Intel MKL ERROR: Parameter 3 was incorrect on entry to DGEQRF.

Is there a workaround that doesn't require to modify my sources ? I'm using null pointers when lwork = -1 everywhere in my code so I would need to change many many routines in my projects, this is not feasible. Thanks.

 

AttachmentSize
Downloadtext/x-c++srcex.cpp287 bytes

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3005

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>